![]() |
|
|
The Canadian federal system has changed dramatically since Confederation in 1867, and it continues to evolve in important ways. In this section, you will find material on the federal-provincial division of powers, intergovernmental relations, fiscal federalism, and the constitutional development of the territorial governments. DIVISION OF POWERSThe basic division of powers
between the federal (Dominion) and provincial governments was set out
in the Constitution Act, 1867, particularly in sections
91-101. Several formal changes have been made to this original division
of jurisdiction:
TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENTSThe Northwest Territories and the Yukon have two distinct
forms of government in Canada. They were created by federal legislation,
yet have powers similar to the provinces and operate autonomously. To
see the similarity between the jurisdiction of the provincial and territorial
governments, compare s.92
of the Constitution Act, 1867 with s.17
of the Yukon Act.
On April 1st, 1999, the Northwest Territories were divided, and the eastern half became a new territory, Nunavut. To find out more, visit the >Nunavut Planning Commission and read the Nunavut Act passed by Parliament in 1993. The N.W.T. government has prepared a detailed response to the Nunavut Planning Commission's report. The CBC has a special In Depth section devoted to the creation of Nunavut, which provides a lot of background information. The creation of Nunavut also means substantial changes to the Northwest Territories; see the NWT government’s Agenda for the New North. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSVery important changes have occurred through more informal
practices between the two levels of governments. Considerable co-ordination
of policy innovations has been brought about through intergovernmental
negotiations among the first ministers, ministers responsible for particular
policy areas, as well as among federal and provincial civil servants.
Many federal-provincial and inter-provincial meetings are supported
by the Canadian
Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat. At this site you will
find information and press
releases and reports from a number of these meetings.
Annual meetings are now held between the Prime Minister of Canada and the provincial first ministers. Read the press release from the February 1999 First Ministers' Meeting for the Framework Agreement on the Social Union agreed to at this meeting. The premiers also meet each year, without any federal participation. All the press releases from the 1997-2000 meetings are available from the CICS. The Alberta government has posted material from the annual premiers' conferences as well as the Western premiers' conferences. Following the 1997 premiers' conference, the first ministers of the territories and all the provinces except Quebec met in September in Calgary and agreed on a resolution to undertake public consultations on national unity, based on a set of agreed-upon principles. You can access some very useful information about federalism issues at the intergovernmental affairs departments of the following governments:
Many restrictions to trade among the Canadian provinces have emerged over the years, but some effort to ease trade was made in the mid-1990s. The result was the Agreement on Internal Trade negotiated in 1994. One major weakness of this agreement, however, is the lack of effective enforcement measures. FISCAL FEDERALISMVery important aspects of Canadian federalism are determined
by the need to transfer money to provincial governments to fund the
programs for which they are constitutionally responsible. There are
two kinds of money transfers: equalization
payments paid to the poorer provinces in order to compensate for
their smaller revenue base; and program payments paid by the
federal government to all provinces to fund programs it considers important.
The federal Finance Department provides a range of interesting material that explains the various kinds of transfer payments, as well as facts about the actual level of funding involved. The 1999 Budget documents include a table of federal cash and tax transfers to the provincial governments paid since 1993, with forward projections to 2003. Equalization PaymentsBecause provincial economies vary tremendously, many
provinces need financial resources transferred to them in order to provide
government services roughly equivalent to those in the rest of Canada.
A better understanding of the economic disparities can be gained from
comparing the differences in the 1995
provincial per capita GDP. Varying economic conditions mean that
provinces and territories have very different tax rates; the
table of comparative tax rates prepared by the Nova Scotia government
illustrates this.
The need for equalization payments to overcome regional economic disparities is so important that it was written into the Constitution Act, 1982:
Program PaymentsThe Canada
Health and Social Transfer is the main vehicle for the federal government
to help pay for health, education, and welfare programs.
Considerable controversy arises because the federal government has been able to attach conditions to the money it gives the provinces. The federal spending power allows the federal government to set standards in policy areas that are normally under provincial jurisdiction. For examples, see the legislation covering health transfers and those for welfare programs:
Because of the large amounts involved in transfers to the provinces,
the federal government unilaterally imposed cuts in the growth of these
transfers. In the 1996 federal budget, Finance Minister Paul Martin
outlined the rationale
for these cuts, which is essentially the large
share of federal spending that is made up of transfer payments of
various kinds (see in particular the tables at the end of the document).
With the Adobe
Acrobat Reader, you can examine useful graphs in the 1996
Budget Chart Book.
The provinces objected to the federal cuts to transfer payments, because they have become an important source of revenue for the provinces. Statistics Canada has posted tables that show the 1999 sources of revenue for each of the provincial and territorial governments; as you will see, transfer payments form a substantial portion. The transfers are crucial to the Newfoundland and PEI governments. The extent of P.E.I.'s reliance upon fiscal transfers from the federal government and the impact of federal cuts in this area are evident in the P.E.I. Finance Department's paper on Federal Fiscal Issues. (Note: this file requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader.) The Quebec government has a background paper on Québec's historical position on the federal spending power, in French. Larry Brown paints a grim picture of the effects of transfer cuts in "Canada After the Cuts." Connect to the latest federal and provincial budget sites, where you can examine the issues in more detail. RELATED LINKSYou can find more information related to federalism
issues in other sections of Nelson's Canadian Politics on the Web:
Aboriginal Issues You can find some other useful material on Canadian
federalism at federalism.ca.
|
|
|
Copyright on all contents owned by Nelson. |